: Eleganter Unsinn. () by Alan Sokal; Jean Bricmont and a great selection of similar New, Used and Collectible Books available. Results 1 – 14 of 14 Discover Book Depository’s huge selection of Alan-Sokal books online. Free delivery worldwide Eleganter Unsinn · Alan Sokal. Paperback. A review and a link to other reviews of Fashionable Nonsense by Alan Sokal and Authors: Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont Eleganter Unsinn – Deutschland.
|Published (Last):||11 June 2004|
|PDF File Size:||4.44 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.96 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Comment by elegganter sender of the contribution. We don’t really get that argument, but it is a fun unsin. Sokal submitted a paper titled Transgressing the Boundaries: It seems fairly clear that the thinkers quoted use scientific terminology not for actual support though we are thinking that topology is a fun thing to apply to psychologybut because the abstract notion “science” lends their arguments credibility.
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Except for on a funky Star Trek episode we can’t see much use for considering the speed of light privileged. Das Risiko und sein Preis — Skin in the Game. The elegantter is not completely black and white — of course relativism operates in many significant areas of human intercourse, including science — the question is in the how and where and of course the why. Please note that these ratings solely represent the complete review ‘s biased interpretation and eleagnter opinion of the actual reviews and do not claim to accurately reflect or represent the views of the reviewers.
On the whole, however, the book is a tough slog. Instead, they are skkal to give a short introduction to the contributions below. In our opinion, however, the authors we are investigating are analogies between generally accepted theories from the natural sciences and theories that are too vague to be empirically verifiable e.
Eleganter Unsinn – die Postmoderne auf dem Prüfstand
The selections are numbingly horrific, an outrage so maddening that we actually found it physically difficult to read the book. Our two cents re. Worth leafing through, but hard to recommend actually reading it. Fashionable Nonsense – US. Whereof one cannot speak, a truly wise man once suggested, thereof one should remain silent. Ein Essay zur politischen Dramaturgie.
Sokal and Bricmont go to great lengths to maintain that they are only attacking the weak science of these works, but the inescapable conclusion is that thinkers who are willing to spew such claptrap without a thought for its meaning, and whose only goal is to cow and intimidate their audience through the use of incontestable terminology and concepts are, in fact, charlatans, and that while there might be some value in their charlatanry it is not really something we should look upon kindly.
Hail Sokal and Bricmont for wasting so much of their lives on such a ridiculous but apparently necessary task.
See all free Kindle reading apps. Amazon Business Service for business customers. Share your thoughts with other customers.
See our Returns Policy. And it doesn’t seem to fly, because these grand thinkers are all so damn ponderous and serious. Learn more about Amazon Prime. Be the first to review this item Amazon Bestsellers Rank: Okay, we have a few differences with them too, especially stylistically Tom Wolfe tried using up all the exclamation marks available to American authors in his novel The Bonfire of the Vanitiesbut Sokal and Bricmont apparently found a load of them somewhere, which they diligently littered through their text.
Their sense of humor — admittedly born out of frustration — is also ill-suited to their enterprise and usninn snide asides do it no service either. Considering foreign concepts is, of course, important, and the interplay between science, society, and social theories should be explored — but exploration means considering, hypothesizing, using the available tools.
Revealing the hoax, Sokal set off quite an uproar, only elegantef part about the question he was addressing — the use of science and scientific concepts and terminology in a non-scientific setting. Eleganter Unsinn – Deutschland. The complete review ‘s Review:. That group and the thinkers they have embraced have twisted all debate into the unintellectual, returning it to the level of theological debate where anything can be proposed and propounded as long as the proper terminology and, in the case of theological debate, the reigning deities are invoked.
This analogy could perhaps contribute to explain relativity theory to a sociologist who is familiar with Latour’s sociology, or to explain Latour’s sociology to a physicist, but what sense should it have in explaining the sociology of Latour to other sociologists on the basis of the analogy to relativity theory? Similarly the illustrative quotes chosen here are merely those the complete review subjectively believes represent the tenor and judgment of the review as a whole.
There’s a problem loading this menu at elegganter moment.
Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
Fighting against privileges in economics or physics is literally the same, but not in metaphorical terms. Naturally there are also some who argue that thinkers in the humanities should not be as earthbound and as hidebound as scientists elefanter should have the liberty of eoeganter truth and reality if it suits their purposes, i. The original parody, included here, is a fairly fun read it can also be found online. No one can really deny that.
Results for Alan-Sokal | Book Depository
While there is something to this, and it eldganter be kept in mind, there is no escaping that the selections offered are frightening and horrendous enough to warrant casting anything uttered by these “thinkers” into doubt. Product details Paperback Publisher: Visit our Help Pages. The notorious parody written sokao Alan Sokal and published by a gullible undinn of academics at Social Text is one of the sadder chapters in modern American academia.
More plausible is the argument that Sokal and Bricmont only show a few selective examples, that these may or may not be representative, and that they often only figure in a small part of the cited authors’ works i. The science aspect is of course easy to debunk, and thank god Sokal and Bricmont have done some of that work. Would you like to tell us about a lower price?
Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. It is a bizarre debate that has evolved around this, and in fact the critical sokl is almost as interesting as the book itself.
If nothing else though Sokal and Bricmont show that clarity is necessary, desirable, and really not all that hard to leeganter — would that modern culture theory at least pick up that much. Write a customer review. Instead of having a good laugh and sending the essay back to Sokal the good folks at Social Text took it seriously and published it.
Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number.